Hit and Run: Criminal Accidents in Los Angeles

Image : http://www.flickr.com

There are many ways for the criminal law-abiding citizens, or to obtain problems Angeles, a city the size of the lot, never do any evil intent to damage, either One way to do this is to invest in a "hit and run" type of disorder in question. Should not be difficult for you in a scenario where you are in a crowded parking lot or driving on the road and imagine for a variety of innocent reasons of distraction or noise, fatigue or less harmless drugYou hit another vehicle.

This is a common occurrence in general insurance companies or regulated private between the parties. Sometimes, depending on the severity of the accident and the damage, and the police are called. Where things get complicated and crime is when a party leaves the scene. This is commonly referred to as a "hit and run."

No matter if the scene in the car left or left the car at the scene and fled on foot and were takenfrom a friend. If the scene without providing information or links, inaccurate or false (the "false note" option on the left).

THE PROBLEM

In California, widely believed to be "hit and run" is codified in Vehicle Code Section 2002 which reads:
t
"The driver of a vehicle in an accident only damage to property, including vehicles involved is to stop the vehicle immediately to the nearest place that do not impede traffic orotherwise jeopardize the safety of other motorists. Moving the vehicle in accordance with this subdivision does not affect the question of fault. The driver shall also immediately do either of the following:

(1) Locate and notify the owner or person in charge of that property of the name and address of the driver and owner of the vehicle involved and, upon locating the driver of any other vehicle involved or the owner or person in charge of any damaged property, upon being requested, present his or her driver's license, and vehicle registration, to the other driver, property owner, or person in charge of that property. The information presented shall include the current residence address of the driver and of the registered owner. If the registered owner of an involved vehicle is present at the scene, he or she shall also, upon request, present his or her driver's license information, if available or other valid identification to the other involved parties.

2) Leave in a conspicuous place on the vehicle or other property damaged a written notice giving the name and address of the driver and of the owner of the vehicle involved and a statement of the circumstances thereof and shall without unnecessary delay notify the police department of the city wherein the collision occurred or, if the collision occurred in unincorporated territory, the local headquarters of the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
(b) Any person who parks a vehicle which, prior drove around the vehicle is again a vehicle in flight and is in an accident involving property damage in question, manned or automatic, is responsible for the Provisions of this section concerning notification and reporting and will be sent to the conviction, the penalties do in this section for non-compliance.
(C) any person who does not meet all the requirements of this section, be guilty of a crime and sentencingthereof, shall be punished by imprisonment in county jail not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. "

California Vehicle Code Section 2002 is to be very clear and specific. No matter whose fault it is, you must meet the requirements listed above.

A Hit and Run can also occur if the car hits a parked car, causing relatively minor damage and leaving the scene. You can not even awarethat an accident has occurred. A bystander or eye witness may take down your license plate number and call the police. It is even possible to be in busy traffic, or on the freeway, and be involved in a collision where one or both parties "takes off" or leaves the scene of the incident. You may even lose each other in to the normal flow of traffic, or due to the speed of the vehicle, or road or weather conditions such as darkness, rain or bad lighting. Even in this situation someone can be charged with a hit and run violation. Even failing to provide complete or accurate information can lead to a criminal filing and can land you in jail for up to six months.

THE SOLUTION

Perhaps you were involved in a situation that is similar to this. You may have been sent a letter by the City Attorney. You may have received a telephone call from a detective, or someone may have come around asking questions about you or your vehicle. It is important at this point not no one to speak and seek the advice of a competent attorney and lawyer who follow 's direction. An attorney try to find the information you enter on the basis of information you are looking for and can generate reports and talk with officers and stakeholders.

A lawyer can guide you through this process, keep out of trouble, and also because the civil arena guide. A civil case is one where only money is involved (evenIf you are not a criminal problem) and where a fraction and the loss of freedom of those involved in detention. A crime as cited above may carry penalties of up to six months in county jail. If injuries are involved or other issues like hitting a pedestrian or were under the influence should immediately contact a criminal defense lawyer, because this type of gear in some situations, and often classified as a crime taken, the lesions are usually involvedcan carry penalties of more than a year in the State Prison.

Over the years many people who have been involved in hit and runs have come to me and I have helped get them out of trouble. Sometimes I have been able to make sure that no charges were filed and even when charges were filed, I was able to either get them dismissed or have been able to resolve them with relatively minor consequences.

I use many techniques based on years of negotiation and legal knowledge including California Penal Code Section 1377-1378.

California Penal Code Section 1377, 1378 provide:

"When the person injured by an act constituting a misdemeanor has a remedy by a civil action, the offense may be compromised, as provided in Section 1378, except when it is committed as follows:

(a) By or upon an officer of justice, while in the execution of the duties of his or her office.

(b) Riotously.

(c) With an intent to commit a felony.

(d) In violation of any court order, as described in Section 273.6 or 273.65.

(E) or to any family or household member or to any person if the violation of a person in section 6211 of the Code or subdivision of a family described, including (b) of section 13700 of this code.

(F) When an old man, in violation of § 368 of the Code or Section 15656 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

(G) For a child, as described in Section 647.6 or 11165.6

An experienced Los Angeles criminalable to solve many defenders hit and run cases through the negotiation of compensation and payment for you and protects you from any criminal liability and imprisonment. Using this code section effectively an experienced lawyer can navigate to the deep sea and Muddy Waters, the criminal justice system and get to shore. As a lawyer, I think that the investigators and speak with the investigator. I can sign the other parties and draft letters for them to contact and knowthe way to present it to the District Attorney, he City Attorney and the judge so they can "sign off" on it.

Although Penal Code Sections 1377 and 1378 provide for a civil remedy thus allowing the criminal court to dismiss a case, usually a prosecutor has to agree to it and it is most certainly in the judge's discretion whether to grant a dismissal under Penal Code Section 1377-1378.
Other factors include the severity of the incident, the age of the person involved, prior criminal record, the victim's desire for prosecution, and other factors not cited here.

OTHER SOLUTIONS

There are some Justifications for leaving the scene of an accident. One of these is to seek immediate medical attention. The social policy here is self evident. We don't want an injured person to stay at the scene of an accident at the cost of their own life, limb or health. In emergencies leaving the scene of an accident may be allowed.

This justification may apply if you are injured in the accident or someone else is injured and you take them to the hospital. Perhaps you were already on the way to the hospital when the accident occurred.

Other situations may also arise. Perhaps you were a passenger who left the scene and you are afraid someone may think you are driving, or perhaps you lent your car out to a family member or friend who has a similar physical description to you. All of these scenarios can be handled by an expert in criminal defense.

What do
What measures should be adopted and the situation is "fair." You have a couple of mistakes and questionable decisions that he had been an accident and left the scene. Do not do anything, still worse decisions. It 's a mistake, and we hope to avoid the problem away. It 's also a mistake to try to address the issue of police searching, talk to the other party orlies.

There is a mistake and a crime following the report falsely that the vehicle was stolen, or make another false report. Whatever the situation, even if you have further complicated the matter, it is important to enter the solution immediately contact a criminal defense and to be with someone who is able to deal with cases of this business. You can not have the defense and the situation, if handled correctly almost as bad as you are entitledmay think. There is always a solution and help is available and just a telephone call away.

**NOTE: The above article is a legal opinion only based on California law only and should not be construed as specific legal advice. If you are not in California, you need to consult an attorney in your State to find the applicable laws. It should also be noted that every legal situation is fact specific and different. You should seek independent legal advice for your matter and not rely on the article above which is general in nature. J.R.

Tags : Blog Hipmore remortgage lenders sell annuity payments remorgage

Small Business Tax Credit - Americans with Disabilities Act

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Many small businesses complain that with the cost of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Most do not know that there comes a series of tax incentives available to offset the costs. It 'important tax incentives in the form of a tax credit, which is much more valuable than a tax deduction when it comes to creating tax savings.

Disable access to tax credit

If you make your small business accessible to persons with disabilities, you can takeannual tax credit. Your company is eligible, if you had one million or less achieved the previous year or 30 or fewer employees. If you meet these criteria, you may request a tax credit of 50 percent of your expenses up to a maximum of $ 5,000. Since this is a tax credit is deducted from your total tax debt.

To claim this tax credit your expenditures must be paid or incurred by your business with the Americans with Disabilities Act may. Such costs may include:

1stPurchase of equipment adaptation or modification of equipment;

2nd Production of print materials in alternative formats such as Braille or audio

3rd sign language interpreters for employees or customers.

Modifications to buildings or offices even be considered until two criteria. First, the changes will not be building something new. Secondly, the building in service before 5 November 1990 had.

Elimination of tax obstacles

AllCompanies can apply a tax deduction for expenses, to remove physical, structural or transportation barriers for persons with disabilities in the workplace. This tax relief will be unlimited in terms of revenue or number of employees. Companies can claim up to $ 15,000 a year as a tax deduction. Expenditure amounts exceeding this amount can be requested but are subject to depreciation calculations.

Claiming that the elimination of barriers deductions, expensesmust lead to the creation of a plant or vehicle is available for guests with disabilities. Examples include:

Provide 1st and ramps curb cuts;

Making 2nd toilet accessible to people in wheelchairs and

3rd The expansion of the width of sidewalks on at least 48 inches.

Significant tax advantages

Small business owners can double their tax saving pleasure, supporting both tax incentives for the same tax year. If a small business spent $ 20.000 to create access for a wheelchairOffice, took a tax credit of $ 5,000 and a $ 15,000 tax deduction.

These tax incentives are in place to significantly reduce the burden of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act If you do not have the credit or deduction for the last three years tax returns on credit, you should file amended tax returns to receive reimbursement.

Related : game Blog Hipmore Buy life insurance Mesothelioma Lawyers San Diego

California Accident Lawyer work by others - a case study - workplace explosion

Image : http://www.flickr.com

It 'important to understand the seriously injured workers and their families, such as California have the right to work. To illustrate injuries of workers California law, the following case study is a job for a fire and explosion accident at work in California. The discussion includes a California Workers Compensation Analysis and liabilities of the California work injury to the analysis of third parties.

A case study - explosion and fire - - Death and serious burns

CrazyDemolition, Inc. installs, removes, and junks petrol pumps and underground tanks. A demolition Loony, Inc. was used with a portable power saw in a tank that was used for underground storage at a service station had been cut. The company did not adequately cut to clean the tanks and test for vapors before and an explosion occurred, killing workers and seriously injured three others.

Three workers injured in the explosion of another company, Joe paving work.All had suffered burns and all its power in order to revitalize the local Burn Unit. On a daily basis have been a horribly painful burn treatment called debridement. Debridement is the process of surgically removing dead tissue around a fire. Living Hell is saying a lot, and an accurate description. They were released from the hospital with amputation, scarring, disfigurement and pain indescribable. All three workers were not back to work because of theirInjury.

Survey:

A study of the Loony Demolition, Inc. was episode:

1st was the atmosphere in the tank before the work test or cut.
2nd Unable to create guidelines for gas-liberation.
3rd Can the recommended procedure produces Used in American Petroleum Institute (API) Bulletin 1604, "Recommended Practice for the recruitment or removal of service tanks to the underground station" is set.
4th Failed to recognize employees and to avoidunsafe conditions while working with tanks that previously contained flammable liquids. This is a violation of 29 CFR 1926.21 (b) (2) and the equivalent in California.

Workers Compensation Analysis:

Loony Demolition, Inc. employee who died was a woman and two children. Under the compensation system for workers in California, entitled, death benefits were obtained. The family, which is less than $ 290,000, a figure very unjust and unfair in the face of devastationthe loss of a husband and father.

Joe's Paving employees also benefits from claiming compensation for California workers' system. However, benefits to workers' compensation California 'are low and are in a constant battle with the workers' compensation carrier about appropriate medical treatment. After almost two years, continuing the unfair system of compensation for the California workers', these workers and their families had difficulty making ends meet living expenses.

Third party work injuryAnalysis:

The family of Loony Demolition, Inc. has the employee died, the defendants not to sue third parties. The family is only for California Workers Compensation death to complete.

The staff at Joe's Flooring have a strong responsibility towards Loony Demolition, Inc. Loony Demolition, Inc. was clearly caused the explosion and fire. In this case, Loony Demolition, Inc. is a "third party". The three injured workers from Joe's Flooring to a third party workAction against prejudice Loony Demolition, Inc.

The workplace has been exploded by the failure of the Third Loony Demolition, Inc., created in the tank before cutting test, these guidelines have been violated for the free gas. Including, the API methods, OSHA requirements and long-standing custom and practice in the area. This terribly injured employees recover millions of dollars for their injuries.

However, money is not the real problem. Money can never replace whatthis catastrophic injured workers have lost. No matter what the amount. The pain and despair are unbearable.

Disclaimer

The above is a case study. Any resemblance to real events, people or companies is purely coincidental. It is not legal advice. It is necessary to clarify the simple. Every case is different and has its separate challenges, difficulties and / or shades. There is no guarantee that your case is similar to that in the section have this case study.

Friends Link : game Hipmore For structured settlement auto ins quote Mesothelioma attorneys

DUI Lawyers Southern California

Image : http://www.flickr.com

DUI lawyers in Southern California have grown exponentially in the large number of the last 5 years all the time. The increased volume of DUI lawyers shows an alarming trend even more in Southern California - the highest number of DUI arrests is happening in the area.

Because an increase in DUI arrests in Southern California?

The increase in DUI arrests in Southern California has a large endowment funds, the highway is to actively supportDUI patrols, checkpoints and DUI enforcement overall greater focus particularly on major roads such as Southern California;

* Interstate 5 Golden State Freeway / Santa Ana Freeway / San Diego Freeway

* Interstate 15 Mojave Freeway / Barstow Freeway / Ontario Freeway

* Interstate 110

* Interstate 405

* I-710

* I-105

Southern California DUI lawyers defend their clients against the two basic positions in southern California DUI case;

*23152 (a) which states that it is a crime, a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol and operating / or drugs.

* 23,152 (b) which states that it is a crime, a motor vehicle with a 08 percent or higher blood alcohol concentration is operated.

Any offenders arrested and charged with DUI in Southern California, with both offenses charged, even if only 1 particular event occurs. This is what a Southern California DUI lawyer willargue against.

A good lawyer is a challenge for every aspect of your event and work with the prosecution to try to develop a reduction or dismissal, all together, if the evidence against them is not enough.

It 's always more difficult to win cases in the area by DUI laws tougher and less lenient judge presiding over the case.

Related : Blog Student Loan Hipmore maine white water rafting

How to Answer Deposition Questions Like a Politician in California

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Any California trial litigation attorney can tell you, whether he or she practices in Indian Wells, Palm Springs or Palm Desert, San Diego, California, Orange County, CA, La Jolla, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Corona del Mar, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Santa Ana, Irvine, Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Temecula, Riverside, San Bernardino, the Coachella Valley, CA, La Quinta, Indio, Yucca Valley, or Joshua Tree, depositions can make or break your case. A good defense attorney can make even the calmest deponent nervous. And then there are some deponents who can drive a litigation lawyer nuts.

Many times, clients want to know how to answer deposition questions. First of all, I tell my clients to answer truthfully. Then I advise clients not to watch how politicians answer questions. This is what can happen if a client ignores that advice.

"You said to the policeman investigating the scene of the accident that you weren't wearing a seat belt yet today you state that you were wearing one," the defense attorney stated to my client.

My client smiled sweetly at the news commentator, just like Sarah Palin did to Charles Gibson in her first television interview.

"Would you care to explain this discrepancy?" the attorney asked. The attorney had introduced himself as Charles Johnson.

"Well, Charlie, I believe everyone should wear seat belts when they are in a car.

"Okay, but can you explain why you told the police officer at the scene that you weren't wearing a seat belt?"

My client smiled sweetly again, giving the attorney her best impression of a political candidate.

"Charles, I believe in a woman's choice, however I feel even more strongly about the sanctity of life."

"You're not going to answer the question, is that what you're saying?" the attorney asked, looking over his own eyeglasses.

"Well, I really think that there are much bigger issues to discuss," the client answered, putting the attorney on the defensive.

"Don't you think it's important for us to know if what you say now is different from what you said earlier?"

My client looked directly at the attorney. "Charlie, I believe what is important here is that your client ran a red light."

"Lets move on to the fact that you claim you never had a back injury before this accident.. How do you reconcile that with your treatment for back pain prior to this accident?"

"Charlie, as you know, you can have a visit to a doctor without it being for an injury. I have to say this type of questioning borders on being sexist."

"Did you or didn't you have treatment for a back condition prior to this accident?" the attorney said, raising his voice.

"It's not what you go to for a doctor, it's what the doctor does for you, Charles, and when you realize that women are different from men, you'll learn that women doctors do things differently than male doctors."

"You're refusing to answer my questions."

"I've answered all of your questions," my client said.

"No," the attorney said. "All you've done is give me stock answers to the questions you want me to give and not answer the questions I'm asking." The opposing attorney turned to me and realized I hadn't made a single objection.

"Please, ask me your question, and I'll be as honest as I can."

"Is it true that this has been your third accident this year and that each time you've been rear ended."

My client smiled and the attorney asking the questions knew he would not be getting an answer to this one that he could use.

"I believe that God has a plan for each of us and sometimes he tests our resolve."

"That's your answer?" the attorney asked. "You might as well be speaking in tongues right now."

"God has a plan for all of us, Charles, even for you," my client said.

"If it's to drive us nuts, it's working," the attorney said. "I'll give you one last chance to answer a question. Did you cause this accident?"

"Charles, what may be interpreted as a cause could sometimes be otherwise viewed as simply trying to avoid the, you know, impossibly difficult or, trying to prevent that kind of thing, then again, even when you are driving carefully, these accidents...and this could be viewed as one of those situations. Does that answer your question?"

Two hours later when the deposition had ended, the attorney was looking frazzled.

"How did I do?" my client asked me after the deposition was over.

I smiled sweetly like any good politician. "It's not how well you did," I said. "It's how many psychiatric treatments that attorney is going to need before he is able to attempt another deposition."

Note - In California, refusing to answer questions can lead to having a motion filed against the party who refuses to answer deposition questions, and an imposition of a fine against the deponent or attorney who abuses the discovery process. Sadly, many deponents and attorneys in California abuse the deposition process when they think the other party's attorney won't take the time to file a motion to compel. An attempt to evade questions as a politician often does, or answering with stock answers instead of providing answers responsive to the questions is clearly improper. And politicians who answer questions in this manner are not setting a good example. On the other hand, some of Sarah Palin's answers to questions put to her by Katie Couric, similar to this deponent's last answer, were so incomprehensible it is hard to know how a judge might view answers such as hers.

Related : Blog Hipmore Remortgage offers Delaware auto insurance

How to Answer Deposition Questions Like a Politician in California

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Any California trial litigation attorney can tell you, whether he or she practices in Indian Wells, Palm Springs or Palm Desert, San Diego, California, Orange County, CA, La Jolla, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Corona del Mar, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Santa Ana, Irvine, Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Temecula, Riverside, San Bernardino, the Coachella Valley, CA, La Quinta, Indio, Yucca Valley, or Joshua Tree, depositions can make or break your case. A good defense attorney can make even the calmest deponent nervous. And then there are some deponents who can drive a litigation lawyer nuts.

Many times, clients want to know how to answer deposition questions. First of all, I tell my clients to answer truthfully. Then I advise clients not to watch how politicians answer questions. This is what can happen if a client ignores that advice.

"You said to the policeman investigating the scene of the accident that you weren't wearing a seat belt yet today you state that you were wearing one," the defense attorney stated to my client.

My client smiled sweetly at the news commentator, just like Sarah Palin did to Charles Gibson in her first television interview.

"Would you care to explain this discrepancy?" the attorney asked. The attorney had introduced himself as Charles Johnson.

"Well, Charlie, I believe everyone should wear seat belts when they are in a car.

"Okay, but can you explain why you told the police officer at the scene that you weren't wearing a seat belt?"

My client smiled sweetly again, giving the attorney her best impression of a political candidate.

"Charles, I believe in a woman's choice, however I feel even more strongly about the sanctity of life."

"You're not going to answer the question, is that what you're saying?" the attorney asked, looking over his own eyeglasses.

"Well, I really think that there are much bigger issues to discuss," the client answered, putting the attorney on the defensive.

"Don't you think it's important for us to know if what you say now is different from what you said earlier?"

My client looked directly at the attorney. "Charlie, I believe what is important here is that your client ran a red light."

"Lets move on to the fact that you claim you never had a back injury before this accident.. How do you reconcile that with your treatment for back pain prior to this accident?"

"Charlie, as you know, you can have a visit to a doctor without it being for an injury. I have to say this type of questioning borders on being sexist."

"Did you or didn't you have treatment for a back condition prior to this accident?" the attorney said, raising his voice.

"It's not what you go to for a doctor, it's what the doctor does for you, Charles, and when you realize that women are different from men, you'll learn that women doctors do things differently than male doctors."

"You're refusing to answer my questions."

"I've answered all of your questions," my client said.

"No," the attorney said. "All you've done is give me stock answers to the questions you want me to give and not answer the questions I'm asking." The opposing attorney turned to me and realized I hadn't made a single objection.

"Please, ask me your question, and I'll be as honest as I can."

"Is it true that this has been your third accident this year and that each time you've been rear ended."

My client smiled and the attorney asking the questions knew he would not be getting an answer to this one that he could use.

"I believe that God has a plan for each of us and sometimes he tests our resolve."

"That's your answer?" the attorney asked. "You might as well be speaking in tongues right now."

"God has a plan for all of us, Charles, even for you," my client said.

"If it's to drive us nuts, it's working," the attorney said. "I'll give you one last chance to answer a question. Did you cause this accident?"

"Charles, what may be interpreted as a cause could sometimes be otherwise viewed as simply trying to avoid the, you know, impossibly difficult or, trying to prevent that kind of thing, then again, even when you are driving carefully, these accidents...and this could be viewed as one of those situations. Does that answer your question?"

Two hours later when the deposition had ended, the attorney was looking frazzled.

"How did I do?" my client asked me after the deposition was over.

I smiled sweetly like any good politician. "It's not how well you did," I said. "It's how many psychiatric treatments that attorney is going to need before he is able to attempt another deposition."

Note - In California, refusing to answer questions can lead to having a motion filed against the party who refuses to answer deposition questions, and an imposition of a fine against the deponent or attorney who abuses the discovery process. Sadly, many deponents and attorneys in California abuse the deposition process when they think the other party's attorney won't take the time to file a motion to compel. An attempt to evade questions as a politician often does, or answering with stock answers instead of providing answers responsive to the questions is clearly improper. And politicians who answer questions in this manner are not setting a good example. On the other hand, some of Sarah Palin's answers to questions put to her by Katie Couric, similar to this deponent's last answer, were so incomprehensible it is hard to know how a judge might view answers such as hers.

Tags : Hipmore Auto insurance rate quote

Criminal Defense Careers

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Criminal defense careers offer several exciting and rewarding positions in both public and private sectors. Employment options in any legal organization would depend upon the size of the firm, specialization, and expertise. Criminal defense lawyer or attorney can specialize in areas such as DUI, DWI, disorderly conduct, kidnapping, domestic violence, weapon crimes, felonies, murder, parole violations, arrest warrants, bail hearings, or summonses. However, a great deal of trial experience is required for any criminal defense lawyer. Most of the criminal defense lawyers work for prosecutor?s or public defender?s office.

The attorneys can specialize in white collar criminal defense. Most of the large law firms consist of a white-collar criminal defense division. They can also work as solo practitioners. White collar criminal defense lawyers provide legal representation for corporate clients against regulatory boards such as the Securities and Exchange Commission or against the corporate crime division of the U.S. attorney's office. Besides crime issues, they can also specialize in embezzlement, price-fixing, fraud, bribery, and racketeering. White collar criminal defense attorneys charge relatively higher than that of large-scale civil litigation attorneys.

The lawyers can also specialize in appellate law. Appellate attorneys can work in both private and government organizations. They spend most of their time in appellate research, presentation of oral arguments, and in the preparation of records and briefs. A wide range of appellate caseload is available in both state and federal courts. State appellate criminal defense attorneys can earn a government salary. Private lawyers engaged in appellate cases can earn a huge amount as salary. Most appellate attorneys will have either prior trial experience or clerking experience for a judge.

Tags : game Student Loan Ferret For structured settlement Auto insurance quotes florida Car insurance price